Filed under: Uncategorized
IEM/BEM is a failure.
As an engineer, I never need to even know what the engineering act is!
Let’s examine what IEM/BEM achieved so far, as quoted from the great Ir HT Wong (member of the great IEM/BEM)
1. To look at the safety of the public
Verdict: Failed miserably. Look at the Kepong overpass. What safety? DOSH have a better process and procedure than IEM/BEM.
2. To emphasis more on the qualification regulation
Verdict: you can’t get a reciprocate Professional Engineer with a Ir title in UK, Europe etc. Example, with a CEng from UK, anyone can get a European PE. With an Ir, people will laugh and walk off. The best is an “ASEAN Engineer title”.
3. To emphasis more on the professional services application
Verdict: What professional services? Like the ones in Jurutera magazine?
4. To emphasis more on the consultancy license
Verdict: what license? license to practice? how many percentage of engineers in Malaysia are registered? Control professional license?
5. Do we need to register the graduate engineers?
Verdict: Yes, without members, you’ll run out of money. Failing to force experienced engineers, they resort to force gullible graduates.
6. Issues of safety and competency CPD requirements; is it necessary?
Verdict: Competence, yeah, i remember, give question out a month before compentence test and let the guys come prepared. After that, award an MOU title (Master of Universe).
Think about why I said that before you talk about engineers act 1967.
Leave a Comment so far
Leave a comment
